the Cleveland Doubleheader


Might as well get this out of the way – the FOX News/Facebook debates. The early game was clearly won by Carly Fiorina, and lost by everyone else. Judged only by the metric of their performances at the 5 O’Clock session, if a candidate didn’t threaten to break into the top-tier, they lost, and the only one that accomplished that was Ms Fiorina. And she did it in spades.

The late show wasn’t so much dominated by anyone as it was a peeking behind the Trump curtain – there’s no “there” there. I would rate Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson and Mike Huckabee as winners, and Donald Trump and Rand Paul as losers, last night. The candidate who most exceeded expectations had to be Dr Ben Carson, because he was the largest unknown going in. He comes across as a decent, bright and articulate man, who is soft-spoken and honest. A great many people who had not heard him before, got to last night, and it had to have a positive impact on his prospects. Ted Cruz, whose public persona has been combatitive, showed why he was a top debater during his days at Harvard Law. His appeal to Independents will increase, even if limited by his Tea Party brand of conservatism. Mike Huckabee impressed a lot of Frank Luntz’s focus group, and I think that will reflect the public reaction somewhat. Marco Rubio impresses every time he speaks. He is charming, optimistic and has a great personal story to tell.

Donald Trump clearly lost, if only because he is still speaking in bumper-stickers, tap-dancing around requests for specifics as well as any of the “Washington Cartel.” In fairness, FOX began the debate with a “gotcha” question aimed at Trump – the question wouldn’t have come up (it never has before in either party) if he hadn’t threatened to jump parties. By staging it as an open question to all candidates, it was obviously engineered to demonstrate that Mr Trump was the only potentially “treasonous” candidate. I was disappointed in FOX for doing that (rather than just asking him about it during the course of the evening). His answer – that he would use his flexible loyalty as a lever – revealed more about Donald Trump than any other utterance of the evening.

Rand Paul, I thought, came across as shrill and petty. He, like Trump, will keep his loyal minions, but I think he, like Trump, is a no-show in the long run.

Overall, even saddled with a billionaire dilatant, the GOP showed a strong field of candidates, especially when compared to a congenital liar, a self-proclaimed socialist, and “Who?”, “Who?” and “Who?”.

the Iranian Bomb


There’s no way to know what kind of deal could have been struck with Iran because we’re stuck with the deal that was. But we do know that, instead of preventing an Iranian bomb, we’ve endorsed one after the deal runs out.

We didn’t get any of things that we were told were necessary to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon – unlimited inspections, suspension of enrichment, destruction of non-allowed infrastructure, dismantlement of their ICBM program – none of it. The inspection of suspect sites will be done by Iran (?!), who will forward samples to IAEA. Enrichment will continue. Non-allowed infrastructure will be stored in “secured” facilities. ICBM R&D will continue after eight years – and, as a non-nuclear bonus, the embargo on conventional arms trade will be lifted after five years. What did we get? A nuclear arms race in the midst of a kinetic religious reformation.

The hostages and nukes got equal treatment from this administration – both got kicked down the road for somebody else (anybody else!) to deal with. I’m hoping that when Iran detonates its first ObamaBomb, the president will have the decency to return his Peace Prize.